Italy exports approximately €12 billion in fashion and luxury goods to the United States every year. It is the second-largest destination market after Europe, ahead of China. With US tariffs on European products rising to 15%, every shipment from Milan to New York is now worth 15% less in margin terms. The question the industry is asking is not whether tariffs will hurt. It is who they will hurt most.
The Geography of Exposure: How Dependent Is Each Brand on the US
Not all Italian luxury brands have the same dependence on the American market. Analyzing geographic revenue exposure is the first step in understanding who is most at risk.
Brunello Cucinelli generates approximately 30% of revenues from the United States. With 2025 turnover of €1.4 billion, American exposure is worth around €420 million. At a 15% tariff rate, the potential margin impact is €40–60 million annually, depending on the ability to pass costs on to the consumer.
Prada Group estimates the American market represents approximately 22% of consolidated revenues. With €5.2 billion in total revenues, the exposure is roughly €1.1 billion. The tariff impact, before mitigation measures, exceeds €100 million.
Moncler, listed in Milan (MONC.MI), declared a US revenue exposure of 18% in 2025. With €2.9 billion in turnover, the figure is approximately €520 million.
Giorgio Armani, which is not listed, does not publish detailed geographic data. Industry sources estimate American exposure between 20% and 25% of total group revenues.
The Three Response Strategies
Faced with tariffs, Italian luxury brands are adopting different strategies. None is perfect. All have a cost.
The first strategy is tariff absorption. The brand keeps US prices unchanged and reduces its own margins to avoid losing volume. This option is viable only for brands with high operating margins, typically above 25–30%. Hermès (operating margin above 40%), Brunello Cucinelli (~30%) and Prada (~30%) can afford this in the short term. A brand with 12–15% margins cannot.
The second strategy is passing costs to the consumer. The brand raises prices in the US market to offset the tariff. The risk is a loss of competitiveness against alternatives produced locally or in countries not subject to the tariffs. In a market where the American luxury consumer is already in a spending rationalization phase after five years of price increases, this strategy is risky.
The third strategy is localized production. LVMH has already announced investments to increase American manufacturing. Some brands are evaluating opening US ateliers for lines destined for the local market. This option requires years and hundreds of millions in investment. It is within reach of the large groups, not of SMEs.
The Problem Nobody Is Talking About: The Artisan Subcontractors
The tariff conversation focuses on the well-known brands. But the Italian luxury production system operates through a network of thousands of small and medium artisan companies that produce for brands as subcontractors.
The Santa Croce sull'Arno tanning district, the Carpi knitwear district, the Vigevano footwear district, the Como silk cluster: every tariff that reduces the sales of an Italian brand in America translates into reduced orders for these workshops.
An atelier of 15 employees producing handbags for a luxury brand operates on contribution margins of 8–12%. When the brand absorbs the tariff internally, it reduces or delays orders to subcontractors. When the brand passes the tariff on to the consumer and sales fall, it reduces orders to subcontractors.
In both cases, the final cost falls on the smallest producer, the one with the least negotiating power.
Who Is Most Resilient: The Risk Map
Not all Italian luxury brands are equally vulnerable. Resilience to tariffs depends on three factors: geographic revenue diversification, strength of operating margin, and pricing power.
The most resilient brands are those combining high geographic diversification with elevated margins and a client base with low price sensitivity.
Hermès, while a French brand, is the reference model: 42% operating margin, ultra-high-net-worth client base with minimal price sensitivity, waiting lists that eliminate the volume problem.
Brunello Cucinelli is the most resilient Italian brand: an intensely loyal client base, direct distribution control, 30% operating margin, positioning in the segment where price is not the conversation.
Mid-luxury brands, those with prices between €500 and €2,000 and a more price-sensitive client base, are the most exposed. In this segment, the American consumer has credible alternatives in domestic production or non-European brands.
The Macro Scenario: How This Story Ends
Trade tariffs historically have two outcomes: a negotiation that reduces them over time, or a permanent realignment of supply chains.
For Italian luxury, the first scenario is preferable but uncertain. The second requires structural investments that the sector has not yet initiated at sufficient scale.
The medium-term risk is not that major Italian brands lose US market share. The risk is that tariff pressure, combined with a consumer spending slowdown and declining brand trust, accelerates the contraction the sector already experienced in 2024–2025.
In this context, brands with the greatest identity clarity and the most loyal client base are the ones that exit the cycle with the least damage. It is no coincidence that the most resilient brands are also those that in recent years resisted the temptation of aggressive price increases.
Authentic luxury is not built in one cycle. And it is not destroyed in one either.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Trump's tariffs cost Made in Italy?
US tariffs on European imports were raised to 15% in 2025–2026. For Italy, which exports approximately €12 billion in fashion and luxury goods to the US annually, the potential margin impact on the sector is estimated at €800 million to €1.5 billion per year, depending on the mitigation strategies brands adopt.
Will Italian luxury prices rise in America?
It depends on the brand. The major names with high margins (Prada, Brunello Cucinelli) are absorbing the cost without raising US prices in the short term. Brands with lower margins may partially pass the cost on to the American consumer in the course of 2026.
Which Italian luxury brands are most exposed to US tariffs?
Brands with the highest percentage exposure to the American market are Brunello Cucinelli (~30% of revenues), Prada Group (~22%), and Moncler (~18%). In absolute terms, brands with higher total revenues have greater value exposure.






